๐Ÿ“ˆ
How to Read These Reports โ€” Pathways Institute ยท Complete Learner Journey
Step 2 picks up exactly where Step 1 ended. Every learner's enrollment baseline โ€” barriers, motivation score, pre-assessment โ€” is already loaded. The mid-program pulse check doesn't start from scratch: it measures confidence delta against the baseline Sopact captured at enrollment. At-risk alerts are generated against that known context โ€” not generic dropout flags.
โœ“Enrollment Intelligence โ†’ 2Learning Journey โ†’ 3Employment Outcomes โ†’ 4Funder Intelligence
Pathways Institute โ€” Spring 2024 Cohort ยท Week 10 of 24 38 Active Learners ยท 4 Withdrawn ยท Learning Journey Report Generated: May 17, 2024
Step 1
Enrollment Intelligence
โœ“ Complete
Step 2
Learning Journey Tracking
You are here
Step 3
Employment Outcomes
View Step 3 โ†’
Step 4
Funder Intelligence
View Step 4 โ†’
Sopact Sense ยท Learning Journey Tracking ยท Week 10 of 24

Pathways Institute โ€” Mid-Program Learning Report

Kirkpatrick Levels 1โ€“3 tracked in real time. Pre-training baseline loaded from enrollment. Mid-program pulse check at Week 10 measures confidence delta โ€” not just satisfaction. 5 at-risk learners identified before they missed a session.

Kirkpatrick L1โ€“L3 Active Week 10 Pulse ยท 38 Responses L4: See Step 3 โ†’
Program Health
71
/ 100 ยท Week 10
+8 vs. Week 4
5 learners at-risk
GPS vs. Rear-View Mirror
Every program tracks completion. Sopact tracks confidence delta โ€” the gap between where a learner started and where they are now. When Destiny R. (disclosed childcare barrier at enrollment, no support network) shows a 2.1-point confidence drop in Week 10, the system already knows her baseline was fragile. The alert is specific: her barrier is still unresolved. That's not a generic dropout flag โ€” it's an actionable coordinator task.
Traditional Tracking Attendance recorded
End-of-program survey only
At-risk found at dropout
No connection to intake data
THREE INTERVENTION MOMENTSPre ยท Mid ยท Post โ€” Baseline Loaded from Step 1 Enrollment Record
Pre-Training Baseline
Locked at Enrollment โ€” Step 1
Technical Confidence4.1 / 10
Motivation Score7.4 / 10
Barriers Disclosed29 of 42
Support Network Present22 of 42
Baseline NoteThis data was captured at enrollment and is pre-loaded into every mid-program comparison. No coordinator re-enters intake data.
Mid-Program ยท Week 10
Pulse Check โ€” Current Report
Technical Confidence6.8 / 10 (+2.7)
Motivation Score7.9 / 10 (+0.5)
Active Learners38 of 42
Confidence Drops Flagged5 learners
AI PatternConfidence drops in 4 of 5 flagged learners correlate directly to unresolved barriers disclosed at enrollment โ€” not skills deficit.
Post-Training ยท Week 24
Final Assessment โ€” Pending
Skills Gain (Projected)+38โ€“44%
Confidence Delta (Target)+4.0 pts
Kirkpatrick L2 EvidenceAuto-generated
Completion Projection88โ€“91%
Projection BasisBased on Week 10 confidence trajectory and current at-risk intervention status. Assumes 4 of 5 flagged learners receive support by Week 12.
KIRKPATRICK LEVELS 1โ€“4Levels 1โ€“3 Live ยท Level 4 Employment Outcomes โ†’ Step 3
LevelScoreFindingSource
Level 1 โ€” Reaction
Did learners find training valuable?
 4.3 / 5.0
Instructor quality rated 4.6/5; curriculum relevance 4.1/5; facility and materials 3.9/5. Facility ratings declining week-over-week โ€” open comments cite inadequate tool inventory for cohort size. 6 learners noted tools unavailable during hands-on sessions.
Tool inventory must be addressed before Week 14 advanced practicum. Risk to L2 skills acquisition if unresolved.
 Weekly SurveyOpen Comments
Level 2 โ€” Learning
Did learners acquire the intended skills?
 +41% Skills Gain
Technical confidence: 4.1 โ†’ 6.8 (Week 10). Skill-specific assessments: OSHA safety: 91% pass rate; basic wiring/welding fundamentals: 78% pass rate. Track B (Electrical) outperforming Track A and C by 14 points on fundamentals assessment. AI mentor note extraction: 11 learners flagged for professional communication gaps โ€” not captured by technical assessments.
 Skills AssessmentMentor Notes
Level 3 โ€” Behavior
Are learners applying skills and growing confidence?
 3.1 โ†’ 7.4 Confidence
Self-efficacy confidence: 3.1 (enrollment) โ†’ 7.4 (Week 10 projected trajectory). 5 learners showing inverse trend โ€” confidence declining despite adequate skills assessment scores. AI analysis: 4 of 5 declining learners share unresolved enrollment barrier (childcare or housing) that was disclosed in Step 1 but not addressed. Barrier persistence, not skills deficit, is driving confidence suppression.
Confidence decline linked to enrollment-disclosed barriers โ€” not program delivery failure. Coordinator intervention targets these 5 learners specifically.
 Pulse CheckEnrollment Baseline
Level 4 โ€” Results
Did training lead to employment outcomes?
 โ†’ Step 3
Level 4 data is collected at 30, 90, and 180 days post-graduation and linked to each learner's persistent Learner ID. Employment outcomes โ€” placement rate, wage gain, 90-day retention โ€” are reported in Step 3: Employment Outcomes Report. All Step 1 and Step 2 context (barriers, baseline, confidence trajectory) is pre-loaded into Step 3 follow-up outreach to improve response rates.
 โ†’ Step 3
โš‘ AT-RISK ALERTS โ€” COORDINATOR ACTION REQUIRED BY WEEK 125 LEARNERS FLAGGED
Level 3 ยท Confidence
Destiny R.
Confidence dropped from 5.8 (Week 6) to 4.2 (Week 10). Disclosed childcare barrier at enrollment โ€” no backup plan confirmed. AI cross-reference: support network not identified at Step 1. Confidence decline pattern matches prior dropout trajectory. Coordinator touchpoint + childcare referral recommended before Week 12.
Level 2 ยท Skills
Professional Communication
11 learners flagged by AI mentor note extraction for professional communication gaps โ€” presentation skills, workplace communication, and client-facing confidence. Not captured by technical skills assessments. This gap correlates with 90-day retention in prior cohorts โ€” learners who complete the program but lose jobs in the first 30 days often cite professional readiness. Add workplace communication module before Week 18.
Level 1 ยท Facility
Tool Inventory
6 learners unable to complete hands-on sessions due to insufficient tools. L1 facility rating declining 3 consecutive weeks. Advanced practicum begins Week 14 โ€” tool shortage will directly impair L2 skills acquisition and L3 confidence for hands-on learners. Procurement request must be submitted before Week 12.
Sopact Sense ยท AI Synthesis โ€” Learning Journey Report
The cohort is on track for 88โ€“91% completion. The confidence gain trajectory is strong, and Level 2 skills acquisition is running above historical cohort benchmarks. The 5 at-risk learners are not a skills problem โ€” they're a barrier persistence problem. Four of the five share an unresolved enrollment-disclosed barrier that was never activated into a support plan. The Week 12 intervention window is still open. The professional communication gap flagged in mentor notes is the most consequential finding for employment outcomes โ€” it won't show up in graduation numbers, but it predicts first-30-day job loss in prior cohorts at 2.3ร— the rate of learners who received communication skills training.
Act Before Week 12
Schedule coordinator touchpoints for 5 flagged learners. Barrier-specific resource referrals are pre-attached to each learner record in Sopact Sense. No coordinator builds the list manually.
Add Before Week 18
Professional communication module for 11 flagged learners. Prior cohort data shows this reduces first-30-day job loss by 2.3ร—. Add to Step 3 follow-up protocol to track impact.
Carries Forward to Step 3
All Learner IDs, confidence trajectories, barrier status, and Kirkpatrick L1โ€“L3 evidence pre-loaded into the employment outcomes follow-up. Follow-up outreach is informed by each learner's journey โ€” not generic survey blasts.