📊

How to Read These Reports — Bridgepoint Accelerator · Complete Application Journey

This is Step 4 — the end of the journey and the beginning of the next one. Everything from the 524 original applications flows into this report automatically. Your sponsors see what the program produced. Your leadership sees which patterns predict winner success. And your next cohort opens with every lesson this one generated — built in, not bolt-on.

✓Intake & AI Scoring → ✓Review & Selection → ✓Winner Follow-Up → 4Program Intelligence

Bridgepoint Accelerator — Spring 2025 Program Intelligence Report Auto-Generated · All 4 Cycles · Sponsor + Board Ready · Dec 2025

Step 1

Application Intake & AI Scoring

✓ Complete

Step 2

Reviewer Workflow & Selection

✓ Complete

Step 3

Winner Follow-Up & Check-Ins

✓ Complete

Step 4

Program Intelligence Report

You are here

Sopact Sense · Program Intelligence Report · Bridgepoint Accelerator

Spring 2025 — End-of-Cycle Intelligence Report

20 cohort companies · 4 cycles of program data · Sponsor deliverable auto-generated · Predictive signals for Fall 2026 selection built in

All 4 Steps Complete Sponsor Ready Board Summary Included

Program Score

/ 100 · Cohort Outcomes
Strongest cycle to date

What Makes This Report Different

This report wasn't assembled by your program team. It was generated automatically from the same data trail that started with application intake. Every number is sourced. Every company's progress is compared to what they stated in their original application. Sponsors don't get a summary — they get a fully auditable record from first submission to final outcome. No consultant required. No reporting project.

Traditional Reporting 2–4 weeks of manual assembly
Numbers sourced from memory
No link to original applications
Can't be audited or defended

SPRING 2025 — PROGRAM HEADLINE NUMBERSAuto-Generated From Steps 1–3 · No Manual Entry

524

Applications Received

+31% vs Fall 2024

Cohort Selected

3.8% acceptance rate

$4.2M

Cohort Revenue (Post)

vs $1.8M at application

9/20

Impact Data Collected

Gap — 11 companies not tracking

COHORT OUTCOMES — PROMISE VS. ACTUALEach Winner Compared to Their Original Application Commitment

Company	Revenue (App → Now)	Pilot / Users	Progress vs. Application Promise	Source
Verdant Climate Tech Climate · Water	$240K → $820K	1 → 3 facilities	Exceeded application commitments on all metrics. Water reduction improved from 38% to 41%. Competitive gap (no landscape at intake) fully addressed — competitive brief submitted at Month 3.	CI-2 · Sep 25
Stackform Labs SaaS · Construction	$1.2M → $2.1M	3 → 6 contracts	Revenue and customer targets exceeded. Impact metric ("rework reduction") never quantified despite three coaching touchpoints. Sponsor report notes this as an unmet program objective — disclosure recommended.	CI-3 · Nov 25
Holo Health Digital Health	$0 → $185K	40 → 410 patients	Strongest growth in cohort. Clinical outcome data collection began Q4 per plan. Hospital partnership contract signed — exceeds any prior Bridgepoint health company at same stage. Recommended for program spotlight.	CI-3 · Nov 25
Reframe Finance Fintech · Lending	Pre-revenue · No change	Pilot on hold	Regulatory pathway blocked — state licensing application pending. Flag from Step 2 selection (regulatory path unclear) materialized as predicted. Program team connection to regulatory advisor made in Month 5. Expected resolution Q1 2026.	CI-3 · Nov 25
NovaSeed AgTech AgTech · Smallholder	N/A — Inactive	Program ended	Co-founder departure confirmed in Month 4. Program placed on hold — not a failure of the accelerator thesis, but a team stability risk that was not visible at application. Record fully documented for future cycle predictive analysis.	Record closed

SIX INTELLIGENCE OUTPUTS — GENERATED FROM THIS DATA FLOWNo Separate Reports · No Manual Assembly

For Program Team

Program Impact Summary

Aggregate outcomes across all 20 companies. Revenue, pilot data, impact metrics, and check-in response rates — sourced to original applications, not self-reported summaries.

For Program Team

Missing Data Alert

11 companies that did not collect impact data identified with names, context, and specific coaching action recommended per their original impact gaps at intake.

For Program Team

Follow-Up Summary

Auto-generated log of all check-ins, responses, overdue contacts, and escalations. Complete audit trail of every touchpoint from Day 1 to program close.

For Sponsors

Progress vs. Promise

Every winner's stated goals compared to actual outcomes. Sponsors see what was promised, what was delivered, and where gaps exist — with honest documentation of inactive companies.

For Sponsors

Fairness & Selection Audit

Full documentation of reviewer scores, bias calibration, and rubric consistency. Program can demonstrate to any funder that selection was evidence-based and equitable.

For Board & Leadership

Board Intelligence Summary

Top 3 companies, program risks, predictive signals for next cycle selection, and cohort-over-cohort improvement trends — one page, auto-generated, leadership-ready.

COHORT COMPARISON — SPRING 2025 VS. PRIOR CYCLES4 Cycles of Program Intelligence · Continuous Learning

Key Program Metrics — Spring 2025 vs. 3-Cycle Average Blue = Spring 2025 · Faded = Prior 3-Cycle Average

Application Volume

524 / avg 400

Cohort Revenue Growth

+133% / avg +91%

Impact Data Collection

45% / avg 62%

Review Time Per App

8 min / avg 34 min

Prior 3-Cycle Average (Fall 2023 – Fall 2024) Spring 2025 (this report)

Sopact Sense · AI Synthesis & Board Pre-Brief

Spring 2025 is Bridgepoint's strongest cohort by revenue and application volume — but impact data collection has declined to its lowest point in four cycles. This is the program's one structural gap. Revenue and pilot growth are impressive; the ability to demonstrate and report those outcomes to sponsors is not keeping pace. The fix is not more coaching — it is requiring impact metric commitment at intake (Step 1) and automating data collection prompts through Sopact Sense from Day 1 of the program. Fall 2026 rubric update recommended: weight impact measurement plan as a scored criterion at application stage.

Sponsor Report Ready

Report generated from this data. Includes all 20 companies, honest inactive documentation, fairness audit, and progress vs. promise table. No manual assembly required.

Next Cycle Recommendation

Add Impact Measurement Plan as a scored rubric criterion for Fall 2026 open call. Target: 80%+ of cohort collecting outcome data by Month 3.

Predictive Signal — Team Stability

NovaSeed failure traced to co-founder risk visible in application. Team stability scoring added to Fall 2026 rubric. Prior cycles show 3 of 4 inactive companies had single-founder or co-founder conflict signals at intake.

Sopact Sense · Application Intelligence Platform

Every Competitor Stops at the Award Decision. Sopact Goes Beyond It.

From 524 applications to a fully auditable program record — scored at intake, reviewed with context, followed through graduation, and reported to sponsors automatically. One platform. One data trail. Every cycle learns from the last.

Book a Demo With Your Applications ← Start From Step 1